Course record ENGR

ENGR 2392

Engineering Ethics and Its Impact on Society

Texas Tech University

4 sections17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2013–2026
Flunk Score54/100
Mixed record

Professors 17 of 17

Jeffrey Hanson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.80GPA
80.0% A
20.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

William Marcy 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.65GPA
73.7% A
20.2% B
4.0% C
0.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Manuel Woersdoerfer 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.00GPA
19.6% A
63.0% B
15.2% C
2.2% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Richard Burgess 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.97GPA
32.3% A
42.7% B
18.8% C
3.1% D
3.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rich Burgess 19 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.53
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.31
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.15
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.12
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Joseph Gottlieb 24 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.08
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.35
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.39
Rumeysa Tekin Baturalp 21 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.57
Course assignments facilitated learning4.39
Opportunities to be successful in course4.47
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.43
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.48
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.40
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.39
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.41
Akhilesh K. Shakya 26 median item responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.15
Opportunities to be successful in course4.24
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.04
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.17
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.14
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.21
Tirhas A. Hailu 16 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.21
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.26
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.24
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.21
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.26
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.27
Mukaddes Darwish 15 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Muge Mukaddes Darwish 6 median item responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Sergio Guillen Grillo 9 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.49
Course assignments facilitated learning4.68
Opportunities to be successful in course4.32
Amy Hanson 4 median item responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.75
Joseph Dannemiller 14 median item responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.86
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.93
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.64
Nurcan Bac 24 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.54
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.38
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.30
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.26
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.13
Ryan C. Campbell 19 median item responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.24
Course assignments facilitated learning4.32
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.18
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.28
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.18
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.12
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.26
Douglas Westfall 14 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.65
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.49
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.57
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.61
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.66
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.70
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 30

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
27 more syllabi

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Shakya, Akhilesh

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.