Course record ENGL

ENGL 4301

Studies in Selected Authors

Texas Tech University

4 sections23 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score53/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 23

John Poch 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.59GPA
70.3% A
17.8% B
11.9% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Brian Mcfadden 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.53GPA
53.0% A
47.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Sara Spurgeon 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.16GPA
58.0% A
16.0% B
16.0% C
5.0% D
5.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

John Samson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.06GPA
29.0% A
47.0% B
24.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Marliss Desens 16 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.22
Course assignments facilitated learning4.16
Opportunities to be successful in course3.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.22
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.23
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.23
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.05
Jennifer Frangos 1 median item responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

1 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Lara Massey Crowley 15 median item responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.87
Opportunities to be successful in course4.93
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.93
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.93
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.87
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.80
William Wenthe 18 median item responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.61
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.22
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.61
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.22
Jacqueline Kolosov-Wenthe 14 median item responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.02
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Ryan Hackenbracht 9 median item responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.96
Course assignments facilitated learning4.89
Opportunities to be successful in course4.93
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Show all 23 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 3

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.