Course record ENGL

ENGL 3366

Style in Technical Writing

Texas Tech University

4 sections18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2024
Flunk Score33/100
Below average

Professors 18 of 18

Angela Eaton 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.50GPA
64.0% A
29.0% B
0.0% C
7.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Sean Zdenek 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.14GPA
50.6% A
28.6% B
14.3% C
0.0% D
6.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Amanda Girard 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.13GPA
37.1% A
43.8% B
12.4% C
6.7% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Celia Merrill 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.50GPA
10.0% A
50.0% B
30.0% C
0.0% D
10.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kenneth Baake 18 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.11
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.61
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.28
Rebecca Rickly 11 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.53
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.53
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.39
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.45
David Young 13 median item responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.85
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.85
Shannon Samson 12 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Chauntain Shields 8 median item responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Mason T. Pellegrini 9 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.68
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.69
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.69
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.55
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.51
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.65
Virginia V.(Lady Falls Brown 21 median item responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.22
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.24
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.49
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.51
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.49
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Amy Koerber 17 median item responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.94
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.82
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.76
Kendall Gerdes 5 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.60
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.80
Susan Lang 6 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.49
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.77
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.69
Sam Dragga 8 median item responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.65
Course assignments facilitated learning4.84
Opportunities to be successful in course4.76
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.86
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.92
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.89
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.83
Crystal L. Elerson 9 median item responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.44
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Joyce Carter 7 median item responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.57
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.86
Amanda Booher 16 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.45
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.38
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 2

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Pellegrini, Mason

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.