Course record ENGL

ENGL 3325

Modern and Contemporary American Literature

Texas Tech University

4 sections17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2025
Flunk Score27/100
Below average

Professors 17 of 17

Mary Hurst 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.08GPA
41.7% A
37.5% B
14.6% C
0.0% D
6.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kerry Fine 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.00GPA
43.8% A
22.5% B
28.1% C
0.0% D
5.6% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michael Borshuk 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.94GPA
31.2% A
40.9% B
21.5% C
3.2% D
3.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Yuan Shu 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.90GPA
23.5% A
58.2% B
10.2% C
0.0% D
8.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Xin Zuo 18 median item responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning3.61
Opportunities to be successful in course3.39
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.28
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.12
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.78
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.39
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.35
Douglas Crowell 21 median item responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning3.91
Opportunities to be successful in course3.89
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.44
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.48
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.80
Madonne Marie Miner 17 median item responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.76
Opportunities to be successful in course4.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.94
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.94
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.65
Bryce D. Conrad 24 median item responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.61
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.73
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.90
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.91
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.72
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.90
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Matthew Hooley 15 median item responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.65
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.68
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.59
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.74
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.69
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.61
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Andrew Keese 6 median item responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Apryl Lewis 11 median item responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.91
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.64
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.82
Zachary Hernandez 9 median item responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.56
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.56
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.78
Wes English 12 median item responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Donna Ingham 9 median item responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.44
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.22
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.44
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Michael Lemon 12 median item responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.92
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.92
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.92
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.92
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.83
Sara Spurgeon 14 median item responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.86
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Taryn Gilbert 16 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.76
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.69
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.88
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.