Course record EDIT

EDIT 2318

Computing and Information Technology

Texas Tech University

1 section27 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2010–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 10 of 27

Teresa Blodgett 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.61GPA
80.0% A
8.4% B
6.3% C
2.1% D
3.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Sungwon Chung 81 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

81 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.05
Course assignments facilitated learning4.03
Opportunities to be successful in course3.94
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.28
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.99
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.27
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.05
Ninghua Han 53 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

53 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.24
Course assignments facilitated learning4.12
Opportunities to be successful in course4.05
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.45
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.44
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.13
Fatih Ari 119 median item responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5

119 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.82
Course assignments facilitated learning3.79
Opportunities to be successful in course3.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.11
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.87
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.65
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.20
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.66
Xi Chen 133 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

133 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.06
Course assignments facilitated learning4.04
Opportunities to be successful in course3.92
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.26
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.11
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.01
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.24
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.05
Murat Kurucay 152 median item responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

152 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.06
Course assignments facilitated learning4.05
Opportunities to be successful in course3.93
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.01
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.99
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.23
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.07
Steven M Crooks 6 median item responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.83
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Van Thanh Phan 15 median item responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.72
Course assignments facilitated learning3.80
Opportunities to be successful in course3.65
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.30
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.05
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.88
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.30
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.93
Timothy Turner 19 median item responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.03
Course assignments facilitated learning4.18
Opportunities to be successful in course3.96
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.14
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.24
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.10
Jongpil Cheon 10 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.07
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course3.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.92
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.20
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.39
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.12
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
Show all 27 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 1

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.