Course record ECE

ECE 3331

Robotics Project Lab

Texas Tech University

5 sections13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2010–2026
Flunk Score39/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 13

Richard Gale 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.27GPA
45.0% A
45.0% B
5.0% C
0.0% D
5.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

David Hemmert 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.24GPA
42.4% A
47.8% B
5.4% C
0.0% D
4.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

John Mankowski 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.20GPA
53.0% A
27.0% B
13.0% C
0.0% D
7.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Brian Nutter 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.00GPA
34.5% A
37.9% B
24.1% C
0.0% D
3.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Samuel Storrs 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.00GPA
26.5% A
47.0% B
26.5% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Derek Johnston 7 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.04
Course assignments facilitated learning4.19
Opportunities to be successful in course4.28
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.65
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.61
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.62
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.56
Mitch Kelley 8 median item responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.53
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.80
Dylan J. Tarter 16 median item responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.07
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.30
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.98
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.90
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.90
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.79
Cesar Augusto Sanchez Villalobos 7 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.29
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.14
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.43
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Henry Johnston Romandini 12 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Show all 13 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 9

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
6 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.