Course record ECE

ECE 3311

Electronics

Texas Tech University

4 sections15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2010–2026
Flunk Score6/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 15

Brian Nutter 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.70GPA
27.8% A
29.9% B
26.8% C
13.4% D
2.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Sergey Nikishin 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.58GPA
30.4% A
18.8% B
34.8% C
7.2% D
8.7% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

John Mankowski 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.40GPA
18.8% A
28.7% B
28.7% C
21.3% D
2.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Timothy Dallas 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.38GPA
12.6% A
37.9% B
31.0% C
9.2% D
9.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michael Helm 22 median item responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.08
Course assignments facilitated learning4.17
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.35
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.34
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.35
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.12
Miao He 32 median item responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning3.93
Opportunities to be successful in course4.03
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.61
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.27
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.32
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.77
Samuel Storrs 4 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.07
Course assignments facilitated learning4.19
Opportunities to be successful in course4.16
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.17
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Matt Abide 19 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.16
Course assignments facilitated learning4.47
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Dylan J. Tarter 58 median item responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

58 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.18
Opportunities to be successful in course3.98
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.18
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.13
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.90
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.79
Derek Abrams 11 median item responses 3.28Eval / 5
Overall3.28 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.44
Course assignments facilitated learning2.46
Opportunities to be successful in course2.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.46
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.94
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.16
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.93
Show all 15 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 4

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section C01

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
1 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.