Course record ECE

ECE 3303

Signals and Systems

Texas Tech University

6 sections17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2010–2026
Flunk Score15/100
Needs work

Professors 17 of 17

Miao He 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.24GPA
35.4% A
53.1% B
11.5% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michael Giesselmann 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.93GPA
35.6% A
35.6% B
21.8% C
0.0% D
6.9% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Ravindra Joshi 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.69GPA
9.0% A
58.0% B
29.0% C
2.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rajnish Kumar 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.68GPA
11.8% A
52.7% B
28.0% C
7.5% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Mohammad Saed 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.62GPA
27.0% A
19.0% B
46.0% C
4.0% D
4.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Hamed Sari-Sarraf 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.26GPA
11.3% A
39.6% B
26.4% C
7.5% D
15.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Andreas Neuber 32 median item responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning3.56
Opportunities to be successful in course3.78
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.03
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.13
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.31
Sonal Bhattacharya 15 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.45
Course assignments facilitated learning3.95
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.06
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.11
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.60
Harshit Surendrasinh Parmar 18 median item responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.72
Omid Bazgir 8 median item responses 3.42Eval / 5
Overall3.42 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.25
Course assignments facilitated learning3.88
Opportunities to be successful in course3.13
Ranadip Pal 16 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.56
Jacob Stephens 20 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Kai Wu 12 median item responses 3.08Eval / 5
Overall3.08 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.92
Course assignments facilitated learning3.33
Opportunities to be successful in course3.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.58
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.25
Mary Baker 8 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course3.88
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Ayrton Bernussi 19 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.48
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.61
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.53
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.37
Tanja Karp 10 median item responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.15
Course assignments facilitated learning4.07
Opportunities to be successful in course3.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.98
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.97
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.97
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.15
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.71
Derek Johnston 9 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.30
Course assignments facilitated learning4.55
Opportunities to be successful in course4.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.72
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 7

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

4 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.