Course record ECE

ECE 3302

Fundamentals of Electrical Engineering

Texas Tech University

3 sections18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2010–2026
Flunk Score5/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 18

Jacob Stephens 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.67GPA
23.7% A
42.4% B
10.2% C
23.7% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Ayrton Bernussi 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.32GPA
16.0% A
20.0% B
52.0% C
4.0% D
8.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Molly Dickens 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.30GPA
22.7% A
20.0% B
24.0% C
32.0% D
1.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Mary Baker 21 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.37
Opportunities to be successful in course4.30
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.16
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.27
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.30
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.28
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.19
Bobby Green 11 median item responses 2.82Eval / 5
Overall2.82 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.18
Course assignments facilitated learning2.00
Opportunities to be successful in course2.73
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.45
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.27
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.36
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives1.91
Jason Hill 5 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course4.20
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.40
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Rajnish Kumar 10 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.32
Course assignments facilitated learning4.35
Opportunities to be successful in course4.32
Golnaz Moallem 16 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.94
Opportunities to be successful in course4.81
Miao He 8 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.57
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Rui He 16 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.69
Show all 18 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 10

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

7 more syllabi

Spring 2026 · Section 001

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2025 · Section 003

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.