Course record ECE

ECE 2372

Modern Digital System Design

Texas Tech University

5 sections20 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2010–2026
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record

Professors 20 of 20

Animesh Chowdhury 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.44GPA
67.1% A
19.5% B
6.1% C
3.7% D
3.7% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Tooraj Nikoubin Boroujeni 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.30GPA
62.5% A
16.3% B
8.8% C
12.5% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Changzhi Li 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.29GPA
46.9% A
38.8% B
11.2% C
2.0% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Samuel Storrs 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.27GPA
48.0% A
40.0% B
4.0% C
8.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Derek Johnston 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.98GPA
45.5% A
30.7% B
8.0% C
9.1% D
6.8% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Stephen Bayne 25 median item responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.26
Course assignments facilitated learning3.48
Opportunities to be successful in course3.73
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.65
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.85
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.96
John Mankowski 32 median item responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.15
Course assignments facilitated learning4.11
Opportunities to be successful in course3.92
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.24
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.18
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.51
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.87
Behnam Askarian 29 median item responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

29 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.07
Course assignments facilitated learning3.93
Opportunities to be successful in course4.31
Richard Gale 3 median item responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Kai Wu 25 median item responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.19
Opportunities to be successful in course3.68
Matthew A. Gaddy 19 median item responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.08
Course assignments facilitated learning4.27
Opportunities to be successful in course3.94
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.84
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.05
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.16
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.05
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Olatunji M. Adeyanju 16 median item responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.04
Opportunities to be successful in course3.98
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.84
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.92
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.78
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.85
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.81
Nazifah Islam 5 median item responses 3.40Eval / 5
Overall3.40 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.94
Course assignments facilitated learning3.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.40
Golnaz Moallem 25 median item responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.80
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course3.84
Nimat Shamim 27 median item responses 3.39Eval / 5
Overall3.39 / 5

27 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.01
Course assignments facilitated learning3.77
Opportunities to be successful in course3.40
Brian Nutter 15 median item responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.80
Course assignments facilitated learning4.13
Opportunities to be successful in course4.13
T J Adeyanju 11 median item responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.45
Course assignments facilitated learning3.82
Opportunities to be successful in course3.73
Harshit Surendrasinh Parmar 32 median item responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.19
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.19
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.06
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.06
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.19
Michael Helm 44 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

44 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.24
Course assignments facilitated learning4.29
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.24
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.24
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.43
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.03
Juan Carlos Rojas Fernandez 6 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning4.52
Opportunities to be successful in course4.19
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.08
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.15
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 10

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

7 more syllabi

Spring 2026 · Section 003

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.