Course record DAN

DAN 2202

Improvisation

Texas Tech University

1 section9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2006–2025
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 9 of 9

Cherry Anabo 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.64GPA
64.0% A
36.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Genevieve Durham 20 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.84
Opportunities to be successful in course4.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.72
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.84
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.79
Seung-Joo Park 11 median item responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.90
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Alison Duffy 26 median item responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.85
Opportunities to be successful in course4.87
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.86
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.81
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.79
Anthony J. De Naro 4 median item responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.81
Course assignments facilitated learning4.92
Opportunities to be successful in course4.78
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.83
Elizabeth Johnson 13 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Ali Duffy 9 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.11
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
Tanya Calamoneri 11 median item responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.52
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.29
Nicole Wesley 19 median item responses 4.99Eval / 5
Overall4.99 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.98
Course assignments facilitated learning4.98
Opportunities to be successful in course4.98
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.