Course record DAN

DAN 1304

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable6 professors
Evaluations: 2001–2005

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 6 of 6

Seung-Joo Park 17 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.51
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.91
Genevieve Durham 19 median item responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.86
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.73
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.87
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.84
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.75
Margaret Eileen Willis 12 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.37
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.68
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.59
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.66
Sara E Martwig 9 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.56
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.78
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.78
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.22
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Yvonne Enid Racz Hasie 14 median item responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.94
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.96
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.96
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.96
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Lorraine E Person 19 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.36
Course assignments facilitated learning4.49
Opportunities to be successful in course4.49
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.27
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.