Course record CS

CS 5332

Special Topics in Software Engineering

Texas Tech University

2 sections10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2004–2023
Flunk Score55/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 10

Eonsuk Shin 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.73GPA
73.0% A
27.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Sepideh Ghanavati 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.00GPA
43.0% A
21.0% B
29.0% C
7.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Tadeo Judas 12 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Akbar Siami Namin 3 median item responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.14
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.29
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.47
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.98
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.36
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.01
Susan Mengel 18 median item responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.97
Course assignments facilitated learning4.97
Opportunities to be successful in course4.97
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.95
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.97
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.92
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.97
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.89
Tommy Dang 17 median item responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.47
Course assignments facilitated learning3.76
Opportunities to be successful in course3.65
Tung Nguyen 49 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

49 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.53
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Robert G Watson 7 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.14
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course4.07
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.29
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.93
Remzi Seker 2 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.53
Course assignments facilitated learning4.40
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.70
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.23
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.37
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.40
Joseph Edward Urban 12 median item responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.28
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.53
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.31
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.55
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.28
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.