Course record CS

CS 4366

Senior Capstone Project

Texas Tech University

3 sections9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2014–2026
Flunk Score88/100
Excellent

Professors 9 of 9

Sunho Lim 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.88GPA
88.0% A
12.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Eonsuk Shin 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.83GPA
89.0% A
6.0% B
5.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Cong Pu 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.80GPA
93.2% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
6.8% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Bashir I. Morshed 22 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Tommy Dang 26 median item responses 3.19Eval / 5
Overall3.19 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.12
Course assignments facilitated learning3.43
Opportunities to be successful in course3.55
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.52
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.05
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.84
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.92
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.08
Akbar Siami Namin 24 median item responses 3.29Eval / 5
Overall3.29 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.11
Course assignments facilitated learning3.39
Opportunities to be successful in course3.37
Victor Sheng 99 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

99 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.68
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Shengli Sheng 116 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

116 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.30
Opportunities to be successful in course4.41
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.28
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.16
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.18
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Marcelo Jenkins 4 median item responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

2 more syllabi

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.