Course record / CS
CS 4352
Operating Systems
Texas Tech University
2 sections17 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score53/100
Mixed record
Average GPA
Tommy Dang
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
AB
3.54GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.10 / 5
16 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course4.12
Yong Chen
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
ABC
3.15GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.49 / 5
20 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.24
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.58
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.46
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.54
Xi Wang
27 median item responses
4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
27 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Larry Don Pyeatt
20 median item responses
4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
20 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.98
Opportunities to be successful in course3.87
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.39
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.18
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.44
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.15
Gopal D. Lakhani
16 median item responses
3.71Eval / 5
Overall3.71 / 5
16 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.56
Opportunities to be successful in course3.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.99
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.84
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.81
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.01
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.07
Eric David Sinzinger
22 median item responses
4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
22 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.19
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.30
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.49
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.14
Jingjing Yao
35 median item responses
3.59Eval / 5
Overall3.59 / 5
35 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.77
Opportunities to be successful in course3.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.74
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.68
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.52
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.61
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.63
OLDHAM, WILLIAM J. B., JR.
33 median item responses
3.90Eval / 5
Overall3.90 / 5
33 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.78
Opportunities to be successful in course3.70
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.18
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.85
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.15
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.48
Jason A Denton
24 median item responses
2.67Eval / 5
Overall2.67 / 5
24 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning2.33
Opportunities to be successful in course2.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.58
Gregory Gelfond
24 median item responses
4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
24 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.17
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Elham Hojati
21 median item responses
4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
21 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.43
Opportunities to be successful in course3.95
Tadeo Judas
22 median item responses
3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5
22 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.68
Opportunities to be successful in course3.82
Alexandra Martinez
4 median item responses
5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
4 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Juan Esquivel Rodriguez
3 median item responses
4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
3 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Zhenkai Zhang
31 median item responses
3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5
31 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.02
Opportunities to be successful in course3.77
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.04
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.88
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.09
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.01
Jialin Liu
18 median item responses
4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
18 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.78
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Eric J. Rees
50 median item responses
4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
50 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.61
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.57
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.40
Show fewer ↑
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Fall 2026 · Section not specified
Yao, Jingjing · Instructor record
Spring 2026 · Section not specified
Rees, Eric
Fall 2025 · Section not specified
Yao, Jingjing · Instructor record
3 more syllabi
Spring 2025 · Section not specified
Yao, Jingjing · Instructor record
Spring 2025 · Section not specified
Esquivel Rodriguez, Juan · Instructor record
Fall 2024 · Section 001
Chen, Yong · Instructor record
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.