Course record CS

CS 4331

Special Topics in Computer Science

Texas Tech University

3 sections36 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2011–2026
Flunk Score29/100
Below average

Professors 36 of 36

Abdul Serwadda 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.62GPA
61.5% A
38.5% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Edward Wertz 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.50GPA
70.0% A
10.0% B
20.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Noe Lopez-Benitez 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 1.90GPA
10.2% A
20.3% B
39.0% C
10.2% D
20.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Sepideh Ghanavati 3 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Susan Mengel 12 median item responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.01
Course assignments facilitated learning4.24
Opportunities to be successful in course4.14
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.55
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.60
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.47
Sunho Lim 8 median item responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.74
Course assignments facilitated learning4.78
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.65
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.69
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.74
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Yong Chen 4 median item responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.13
Opportunities to be successful in course4.05
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Yu Zhuang 9 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Bashir I. Morshed 10 median item responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.15
Opportunities to be successful in course3.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.86
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.34
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.06
Tommy Dang 12 median item responses 3.35Eval / 5
Overall3.35 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.33
Course assignments facilitated learning3.61
Opportunities to be successful in course3.39
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.08
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.13
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.29
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.42
Eonsuk Shin 9 median item responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.20
Course assignments facilitated learning4.47
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Eric J. Rees 5 median item responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.93
Course assignments facilitated learning4.91
Opportunities to be successful in course4.92
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.92
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.95
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.41
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.93
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.88
Tung Nguyen 13 median item responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.92
Course assignments facilitated learning4.23
Opportunities to be successful in course3.85
Stas Tiomkin 6 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
Song Liao 25 median item responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.54
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.44
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.48
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.28
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.28
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.16
Timothy Dallas 2 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Akalanka Dissanayaka Mohottalalage 3 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Richard Matovu 3 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Maaz Amjad 19 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.64
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.64
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.54
Mohan Sridharan 1 median item responses 2.69Eval / 5
Overall2.69 / 5

1 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.50
Course assignments facilitated learning2.50
Opportunities to be successful in course2.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.00
Jerry Perez 33 median item responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

33 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.09
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Fang Jin 12 median item responses 3.19Eval / 5
Overall3.19 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.92
Course assignments facilitated learning3.33
Opportunities to be successful in course3.33
Victor Sheng 25 median item responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.13
Course assignments facilitated learning3.59
Opportunities to be successful in course3.13
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.16
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.32
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.12
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.76
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.64
Lu Wei 13 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Lin Chen 14 median item responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.50
Course assignments facilitated learning3.93
Opportunities to be successful in course3.43
Ying Liu 8 median item responses 3.59Eval / 5
Overall3.59 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.38
Course assignments facilitated learning3.75
Opportunities to be successful in course3.63
Mona Rizvi 2 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Tianxi Ji 5 median item responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.40
Course assignments facilitated learning3.20
Opportunities to be successful in course3.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.20
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.60
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.40
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.80
Arturo Camacho 6 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.17
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.83
Lin Zhou 16 median item responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.44
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.44
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.19
Zhenkai Zhang 15 median item responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.40
Course assignments facilitated learning3.93
Opportunities to be successful in course3.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.87
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.93
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.07
Eunseog Youn 15 median item responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.81
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.81
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.64
Ziwen Pan 10 median item responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.80
Course assignments facilitated learning3.70
Opportunities to be successful in course3.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.50
Pushkar Ogale 3 median item responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.67
Course assignments facilitated learning3.67
Opportunities to be successful in course3.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.67
Richard Watson 8 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.39
Opportunities to be successful in course4.48
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.38
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Larry Don Pyeatt 6 median item responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.92
Course assignments facilitated learning4.11
Opportunities to be successful in course4.11
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.68
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.68
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.18
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.68
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.43
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 19

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

16 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.