Fall 2026 · Section not specified
Camacho, Arturo · Instructor record
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Course record CS
CS 3364
Design and Analysis of Algorithms
3 sections19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score51/100
Mixed record
Joseph Rushton 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall3.87 / 5
23 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.84
Course assignments facilitated learning3.93
Opportunities to be successful in course3.84
Richard Watson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.15GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.79 / 5
25 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.52
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.94
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.98
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.88
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.96
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.84
Michael Gelfond 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.87GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.25 / 5
19 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.15
Course assignments facilitated learning4.41
Opportunities to be successful in course4.24
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.53
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.19
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.13
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.07
Bharti H Temkin 15 median item responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5
15 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.94
Course assignments facilitated learning3.61
Opportunities to be successful in course3.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.98
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.04
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.93
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.85
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.29
Hector Juan Hernandez 18 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5
18 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.03
Course assignments facilitated learning4.09
Opportunities to be successful in course4.07
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.29
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.53
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.89
Eric David Sinzinger 21 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5
21 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.96
Course assignments facilitated learning3.96
Opportunities to be successful in course4.03
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.37
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.35
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.39
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.68
Eunseog Youn 23 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
23 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.36
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.34
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.61
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Rattikorn Hewett 12 median item responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
12 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.01
Course assignments facilitated learning4.14
Opportunities to be successful in course4.08
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.92
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.83
Gopal D. Lakhani 14 median item responses 3.22Eval / 5
Overall3.22 / 5
14 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning2.54
Opportunities to be successful in course2.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.92
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.50
Moitrayee Chatterje 15 median item responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5
15 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Course documents
Syllabi 7
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Fall 2026 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Fall 2026 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
4 more syllabi
Spring 2026 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Spring 2026 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Fall 2025 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Fall 2025 · Section 002
Instructor not extracted
Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.