Course record CS

CS 3364

Design and Analysis of Algorithms

Texas Tech University

3 sections19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score51/100
Mixed record

Professors 19 of 19

Joseph Rushton 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.90GPA
94.9% A
3.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Richard Watson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.15GPA
49.0% A
28.0% B
13.0% C
10.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michael Gelfond 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.87GPA
37.4% A
27.5% B
22.0% C
11.0% D
2.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Bharti H Temkin 15 median item responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.94
Course assignments facilitated learning3.61
Opportunities to be successful in course3.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.98
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.04
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.93
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.85
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.29
Hector Juan Hernandez 18 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.03
Course assignments facilitated learning4.09
Opportunities to be successful in course4.07
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.29
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.53
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.89
Eric David Sinzinger 21 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.96
Course assignments facilitated learning3.96
Opportunities to be successful in course4.03
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.37
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.35
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.39
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.68
Eunseog Youn 23 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.36
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.34
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.61
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Rattikorn Hewett 12 median item responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.01
Course assignments facilitated learning4.14
Opportunities to be successful in course4.08
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.92
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.83
Gopal D. Lakhani 14 median item responses 3.22Eval / 5
Overall3.22 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning2.54
Opportunities to be successful in course2.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.92
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.50
Moitrayee Chatterje 15 median item responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Tommy Dang 20 median item responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.55
Victor Sheng 26 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.12
Course assignments facilitated learning4.37
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Uma Maheswari Chinta 50 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

50 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.47
Course assignments facilitated learning4.47
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.43
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.41
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.46
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.34
Shengli Sheng 65 median item responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

65 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.08
Course assignments facilitated learning4.14
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.20
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.32
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.09
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.09
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
Mario Albert Pitalua-Rodriguez 6 median item responses 3.78Eval / 5
Overall3.78 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.50
Course assignments facilitated learning3.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Sumaiya Shomaji 7 median item responses 3.13Eval / 5
Overall3.13 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.94
Course assignments facilitated learning3.40
Opportunities to be successful in course3.05
Uma Chinta Chinta 46 median item responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

46 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.87
Course assignments facilitated learning4.13
Opportunities to be successful in course3.89
Yuanlin Zhang 20 median item responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.08
Course assignments facilitated learning3.77
Opportunities to be successful in course3.35
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.70
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.15
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.82
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.80
Arturo Camacho 5 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.60
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 7

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
4 more syllabi

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.