Course record CS

CS 1382

Discrete Computational Structures

Texas Tech University

5 sections25 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2006–2026
Flunk Score7/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 25

Evgenii Balai 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.82GPA
31.3% A
41.7% B
13.5% C
3.1% D
10.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Richard Watson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.60GPA
33.3% A
29.2% B
10.4% C
18.8% D
8.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michael Gelfond 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.60GPA
25.0% A
33.3% B
26.2% C
8.3% D
7.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Joseph Rushton 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.44GPA
15.0% A
35.0% B
29.0% C
21.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rattikorn Hewett 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.33GPA
20.3% A
23.0% B
36.5% C
10.8% D
9.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Maede Rayatidamavandi 20 median item responses 3.25Eval / 5
Overall3.25 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.05
Course assignments facilitated learning3.55
Opportunities to be successful in course3.15
Angel Ricardo Morales 26 median item responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.71
Course assignments facilitated learning3.50
Opportunities to be successful in course3.62
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.07
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.27
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.18
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.40
Yu Zhuang 17 median item responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.58
Course assignments facilitated learning3.96
Opportunities to be successful in course3.70
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.95
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.96
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.95
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.89
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.73
Gopal D. Lakhani 21 median item responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.18
Course assignments facilitated learning3.48
Opportunities to be successful in course3.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.16
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.16
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.92
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.15
Samujjwal Bhandari 15 median item responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.88
Course assignments facilitated learning3.38
Opportunities to be successful in course3.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.35
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.17
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.43
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.03
Show all 25 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 11

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

8 more syllabi

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Franklin, Scott

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Franklin, Scott

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.