Course record CS

CS 1382

Discrete Computational Structures

Texas Tech University

5 sections25 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2006–2026
Flunk Score7/100
Needs work

Professors 25 of 25

Evgenii Balai 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.82GPA
31.3% A
41.7% B
13.5% C
3.1% D
10.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Richard Watson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.60GPA
33.3% A
29.2% B
10.4% C
18.8% D
8.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michael Gelfond 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.60GPA
25.0% A
33.3% B
26.2% C
8.3% D
7.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Joseph Rushton 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.44GPA
15.0% A
35.0% B
29.0% C
21.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Rattikorn Hewett 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.33GPA
20.3% A
23.0% B
36.5% C
10.8% D
9.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Maede Rayatidamavandi 20 median item responses 3.25Eval / 5
Overall3.25 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.05
Course assignments facilitated learning3.55
Opportunities to be successful in course3.15
Angel Ricardo Morales 26 median item responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.71
Course assignments facilitated learning3.50
Opportunities to be successful in course3.62
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.07
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.27
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.18
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.40
Yu Zhuang 17 median item responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.58
Course assignments facilitated learning3.96
Opportunities to be successful in course3.70
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.95
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.96
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.95
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.89
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.73
Gopal D. Lakhani 21 median item responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.18
Course assignments facilitated learning3.48
Opportunities to be successful in course3.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.16
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.16
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.92
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.15
Samujjwal Bhandari 15 median item responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.88
Course assignments facilitated learning3.38
Opportunities to be successful in course3.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.35
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.17
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.43
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.03
Yuanlin Zhang 25 median item responses 3.28Eval / 5
Overall3.28 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.32
Course assignments facilitated learning3.40
Opportunities to be successful in course3.12
Richard Matovu 23 median item responses 3.68Eval / 5
Overall3.68 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.11
Opportunities to be successful in course3.57
Juan Carlos Rojas Fernandez 3 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Abdul Serwadda 27 median item responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

27 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.74
Course assignments facilitated learning4.23
Opportunities to be successful in course3.75
Marcelo Jenkins 5 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Mustafa N. Alam 15 median item responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.94
Course assignments facilitated learning3.55
Opportunities to be successful in course3.08
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.22
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Richard Burke 5 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.70
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Scott R. Franklin 27 median item responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

27 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.72
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.64
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.77
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.77
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.69
Neda Tavakoli 18 median item responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course3.89
Erfan Arefin 18 median item responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.61
Course assignments facilitated learning4.22
Opportunities to be successful in course3.89
Jose Mario Carranza Rojas 6 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Ruben Gonzalez Villanueva 9 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.22
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.22
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.89
Hector Juan Hernandez 19 median item responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.93
Course assignments facilitated learning3.60
Opportunities to be successful in course3.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.29
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.88
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.27
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.32
Batbold Myagmarjav 28 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.32
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.19
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.43
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.32
Michael Bullington 5 median item responses 3.80Eval / 5
Overall3.80 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning3.00
Opportunities to be successful in course3.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.40
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.00
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 11

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

8 more syllabi

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Franklin, Scott

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Franklin, Scott

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.