Course record COMS

COMS 3355

Communication in Organizations

Texas Tech University

5 sections22 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 22

Thomas Kirkscey 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.39GPA
55.6% A
39.5% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
4.9% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Marjorie Buckner 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.04GPA
47.8% A
30.4% B
4.3% C
13.0% D
4.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Megan Mendiola 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.00GPA
21.7% A
56.5% B
21.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Bolanle Olaniran 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.68GPA
10.0% A
49.0% B
40.0% C
1.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Adam Testerman 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.63GPA
23.2% A
42.7% B
17.1% C
7.3% D
9.8% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Juliann Christine Scholl 25 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.52
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.61
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.68
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Joseph J Gantt 23 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.65
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.68
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.53
Jason Smith 25 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.68
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.68
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.72
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.76
Anthony Lastrape 3 median item responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.95
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Joe Provencher 28 median item responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.68
Course assignments facilitated learning4.32
Opportunities to be successful in course3.82
Show all 22 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

2 more syllabi

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.