Course record COMS

COMS 3355

Communication in Organizations

Texas Tech University

5 sections22 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below average

Professors 22 of 22

Thomas Kirkscey 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.39GPA
55.6% A
39.5% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
4.9% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Marjorie Buckner 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.04GPA
47.8% A
30.4% B
4.3% C
13.0% D
4.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Megan Mendiola 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.00GPA
21.7% A
56.5% B
21.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Bolanle Olaniran 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.68GPA
10.0% A
49.0% B
40.0% C
1.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Adam Testerman 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.63GPA
23.2% A
42.7% B
17.1% C
7.3% D
9.8% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Juliann Christine Scholl 25 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.52
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.61
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.68
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Joseph J Gantt 23 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.65
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.68
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.53
Jason Smith 25 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.68
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.68
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.72
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.76
Anthony Lastrape 3 median item responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.95
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Joe Provencher 28 median item responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.68
Course assignments facilitated learning4.32
Opportunities to be successful in course3.82
Samer Melhem 23 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.01
Course assignments facilitated learning4.37
Opportunities to be successful in course4.08
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.04
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.31
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.36
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.38
Julie Grandjean 41 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

41 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.61
Course assignments facilitated learning4.78
Opportunities to be successful in course4.51
Victoria Moultry 15 median item responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.84
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.96
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.91
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.88
Maria E. Shpeer 24 median item responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.92
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.79
Elisabeth D. Mcnaughtan 14 median item responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.71
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.79
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.64
Phillip S. Thomson 12 median item responses 3.44Eval / 5
Overall3.44 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.08
Course assignments facilitated learning3.38
Opportunities to be successful in course3.88
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.63
Brendan Kelly Ogrady 2 median item responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.00
Course assignments facilitated learning3.50
Opportunities to be successful in course3.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Alice Crume 5 median item responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.40
Melanie Beth Grellhesl 10 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.10
Opportunities to be successful in course4.10
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.20
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.10
Liz Mcnaughtan 17 median item responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.76
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.82
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.88
Deann M Drake 27 median item responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

27 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.92
Opportunities to be successful in course4.81
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.85
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.93
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.89
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.93
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.93
William T. Howe 11 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.76
Opportunities to be successful in course4.72
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.73
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.73
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

2 more syllabi

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.