Course record COMS

COMS 3335

Nonverbal Communication

Texas Tech University

2 sections9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2015–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average

Professors 9 of 9

Mary Lagasse 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.18GPA
43.0% A
39.0% B
15.0% C
0.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jeremy Torrez 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.00GPA
43.6% A
37.6% B
5.9% C
0.0% D
12.9% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Leanne Lagasse 25 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Narissra Carter 26 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.52
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.74
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.77
Anthony Lastrape 11 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.65
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.59
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.65
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.59
James L. Doran 19 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.68
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.64
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.54
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.66
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.62
Aubree A. Herman 14 median item responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.57
Course assignments facilitated learning4.29
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.29
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.43
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.43
Kay Shannon 33 median item responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

33 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.70
Course assignments facilitated learning4.73
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Sonia Moore 8 median item responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.75
Course documents

Syllabi 6

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

3 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.