Course record / COMS
COMS 3314
Argumentation and Debate
Texas Tech University
2 sections16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score37/100
Below average
Average GPA
Catherine Langford
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
A
3.71GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.61 / 5
8 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.57
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.51
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.55
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Adam Testerman
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
AB
2.54GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.41 / 5
10 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.39
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.40
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
David Edward Williams
19 median item responses
4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
19 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.68
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.79
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.74
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.84
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
Ricky Shafer
20 median item responses
4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
20 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.81
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.78
Douglas M Trank
19 median item responses
4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
19 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.06
Opportunities to be successful in course4.26
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.32
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.84
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.22
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Joseph J Gantt
18 median item responses
4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
18 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.77
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.81
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.76
Robert Layne
17 median item responses
4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
17 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.39
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.46
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.35
Al Hiland
13 median item responses
4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
13 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.64
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.98
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.20
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.24
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.32
Kelsey Moore
28 median item responses
4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
28 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.46
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Phillip S. Thomson
10 median item responses
4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
10 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.31
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.34
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.32
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.20
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.27
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.32
Show all 16 professors ↓
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Fall 2025 · Section 001
Instructor not extracted
Spring 2025 · Section not specified
Instructor not extracted
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.