Course record COMS

COMS 3314

Argumentation and Debate

Texas Tech University

2 sections16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score37/100
Below average

Professors 16 of 16

Catherine Langford 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.71GPA
79.0% A
14.0% B
7.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Adam Testerman 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.54GPA
21.3% A
42.7% B
14.6% C
11.2% D
10.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

David Edward Williams 19 median item responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.68
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.79
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.74
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.84
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
Ricky Shafer 20 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.74
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.81
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.78
Douglas M Trank 19 median item responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.21
Course assignments facilitated learning4.06
Opportunities to be successful in course4.26
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.32
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.84
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.22
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Joseph J Gantt 18 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.72
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.77
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.81
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.76
Robert Layne 17 median item responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.30
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.39
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.46
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.35
Al Hiland 13 median item responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.64
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.98
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.20
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.24
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.32
Kelsey Moore 28 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.46
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Phillip S. Thomson 10 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.95
Course assignments facilitated learning4.31
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.34
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.32
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.20
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.27
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.32
Katie Langford 7 median item responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.14
Course assignments facilitated learning4.15
Opportunities to be successful in course4.48
Christiana Christofides 9 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Jared Bressler 8 median item responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.38
Course assignments facilitated learning3.63
Opportunities to be successful in course3.63
Miles A Kimball 2 median item responses 1.56Eval / 5
Overall1.56 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized1.00
Course assignments facilitated learning1.00
Opportunities to be successful in course1.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content1.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives1.50
Prairie A Endres-Parnell 14 median item responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.09
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.17
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.41
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.21
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.32
Scott Thomson 8 median item responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning3.94
Opportunities to be successful in course3.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.92
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.14
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.14
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.91
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 2

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.