Course record COMS

COMS 3313

Persuasion

Texas Tech University

2 sections23 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score9/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 23

Mark Gring 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.71GPA
16.0% A
56.0% B
15.0% C
7.0% D
6.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Catherine Langford 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.51GPA
20.2% A
31.5% B
34.8% C
5.6% D
7.9% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

David Edward Williams 25 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.56
Course assignments facilitated learning4.48
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.52
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.52
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.40
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.32
Jenna Hoefer 5 median item responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
John Ross E. Bliese 18 median item responses 2.97Eval / 5
Overall2.97 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.94
Course assignments facilitated learning2.69
Opportunities to be successful in course2.61
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.28
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.89
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.44
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.67
Ricky Shafer 31 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

31 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.55
Opportunities to be successful in course4.48
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.58
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.77
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.29
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Alyssa Fiebrantz 8 median item responses 3.27Eval / 5
Overall3.27 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.48
Course assignments facilitated learning3.23
Opportunities to be successful in course3.11
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.64
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.30
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.93
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.64
Hyo Jin Kim 28 median item responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.93
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course3.57
Gary Schwantz 34 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

34 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Julie Grandjean 44 median item responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

44 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.89
Course assignments facilitated learning4.86
Opportunities to be successful in course4.84
Show all 23 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 10

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

7 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.