Course record COMS

COMS 3302

Communication Research

Texas Tech University

1 section16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2015–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 16 of 16

Marjorie Buckner 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.55GPA
18.4% A
35.6% B
34.5% C
4.6% D
6.9% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Joe Provencher 54 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

54 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.12
Gary Schwantz 18 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Emma Bedor Hiland 48 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

48 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.14
Course assignments facilitated learning4.26
Opportunities to be successful in course3.91
Maria E. Shpeer 25 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.57
Opportunities to be successful in course4.18
Maggie Bennett Brown 4 median item responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.94
Course assignments facilitated learning4.94
Opportunities to be successful in course4.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Raymond Glenn 32 median item responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.06
Marjorie Meier 28 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.39
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.46
Narissra Carter 27 median item responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5

27 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.26
Opportunities to be successful in course3.67
Anthony Lastrape 7 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.65
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Bryson Carroll 19 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.39
Course assignments facilitated learning4.57
Opportunities to be successful in course4.27
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.41
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.58
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.45
Paul B. Carroll 36 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

36 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.59
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.38
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.39
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.30
Julie Grandjean 14 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.21
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course4.14
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.29
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.29
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.29
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Patrick Hughes 6 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.76
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.62
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.73
Samer Melhem 37 median item responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

37 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.01
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course3.99
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.07
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.36
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Margaret E. Bennett Brown 14 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.68
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.66
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.65
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.53
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.57
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.53
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.52
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 4

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2025 · Section D01

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
1 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.