Course record COMS

COMS 1301

Interpersonal Communication

Texas Tech University

1 section16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 16 of 16

Narissra Carter 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.55GPA
17.9% A
36.8% B
30.5% C
10.5% D
4.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Janette K Taylor 51 median item responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

51 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.66
Opportunities to be successful in course4.69
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.81
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.77
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.82
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Melanie Anne Neal 24 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.58
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.46
Narissa M Punyanunt 62 median item responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

62 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.26
Course assignments facilitated learning4.27
Opportunities to be successful in course4.31
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.48
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.43
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.51
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.28
Narissra Punyanunt 79 median item responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

79 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.09
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course4.08
Deann M Drake 31 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

31 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.61
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.77
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.61
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.65
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.68
Kelly M Mcculloch 17 median item responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.47
Course assignments facilitated learning3.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.41
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.47
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.29
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.53
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.18
Jian Rui 53 median item responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

53 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.21
Course assignments facilitated learning4.43
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Ben Alfonsin 21 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.81
Course assignments facilitated learning4.86
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Aubree A. Herman 30 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

30 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.73
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.53
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.60
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Sumeyya Akdilek 13 median item responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.64
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.72
Brendan Kelly Ogrady 1 median item responses 3.13Eval / 5
Overall3.13 / 5

1 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized1.00
Course assignments facilitated learning3.00
Opportunities to be successful in course3.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.00
Prairie A Endres-Parnell 9 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.11
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.44
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Sydney Brammer 10 median item responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.80
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Katie Schoonover 44 median item responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

44 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.78
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.68
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.68
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.57
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.68
Wei Cui 22 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.65
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.55
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.45
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.36
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.18
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.45
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 2

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.