Course record CHEM

CHEM 3313

Experimental Biological Chemistry

Texas Tech University

1 section16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 16 of 16

Joachim Weber 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Robert Shaw 25 median item responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning3.53
Opportunities to be successful in course3.47
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.86
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.58
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.39
Achim Weber 26 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.51
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.51
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.46
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.49
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.34
Yunxiang Li 14 median item responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.74
Course assignments facilitated learning4.84
Opportunities to be successful in course4.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.86
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.93
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Bereket Okbu 7 median item responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.65
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.48
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.18
Chathurada Gajadeera 12 median item responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.92
Course assignments facilitated learning4.92
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.83
Ranjith Kumar Nadipalli 17 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.39
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.59
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.71
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.69
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.59
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.53
Boden Vanderloop 13 median item responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.92
Course assignments facilitated learning4.85
Opportunities to be successful in course4.92
Anthony Bui 19 median item responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.90
Course assignments facilitated learning4.89
Opportunities to be successful in course4.84
Collin Borcik 16 median item responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.94
Course assignments facilitated learning4.94
Opportunities to be successful in course4.75
Jayan Ukwatta 5 median item responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.80
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Duncan A. Chandler 24 median item responses 2.28Eval / 5
Overall2.28 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
Chiako Farshadfar 21 median item responses 1.72Eval / 5
Overall1.72 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.43
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.43
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.38
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.48
Mallika Kumar 20 median item responses 1.61Eval / 5
Overall1.61 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.15
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.15
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.30
Benjamin Wylie 26 median item responses 2.68Eval / 5
Overall2.68 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.75
Course assignments facilitated learning3.27
Opportunities to be successful in course3.17
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.04
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content2.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.12
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.27
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.31
Nicholas A. Laroe 13 median item responses 2.94Eval / 5
Overall2.94 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized1.89
Course assignments facilitated learning1.93
Opportunities to be successful in course2.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.15
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.95
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.84
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.86
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 7

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

4 more syllabi

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Laroe, Nicholas

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.