Course record CHEM

CHEM 3310

Molecular Biochemistry

Texas Tech University

4 sections19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2006–2026
Flunk Score11/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 19

Michael Latham 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.95GPA
26.8% A
44.3% B
25.8% C
2.1% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Mieke Lahousse 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.93GPA
21.0% A
50.0% B
29.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

John D'Auria 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.50GPA
18.7% A
35.2% B
28.6% C
12.1% D
5.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jill White 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.28GPA
8.0% A
37.5% B
37.5% C
8.0% D
9.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Mike Latham 62 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

62 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Paul Pare 59 median item responses 3.81Eval / 5
Overall3.81 / 5

59 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.92
Course assignments facilitated learning3.65
Opportunities to be successful in course3.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.97
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.10
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.72
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.11
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.29
William Nes 71 median item responses 3.88Eval / 5
Overall3.88 / 5

71 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.86
Course assignments facilitated learning3.72
Opportunities to be successful in course3.69
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.32
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.18
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.38
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.17
Jeremy Mason 66 median item responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

66 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.06
Course assignments facilitated learning4.11
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.29
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.28
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.98
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.19
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.95
Achim Weber 44 median item responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

44 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.28
Course assignments facilitated learning4.55
Opportunities to be successful in course4.39
Benjamin Wylie 26 median item responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.35
Opportunities to be successful in course4.11
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.58
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.96
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.65
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.04
Show all 19 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 6

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

3 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.