Course record CHEM

CHEM 2103

Experimental Introductory Organic Chemistry

Texas Tech University

1 section22 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2011–2025
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 22 of 22

Douglas Pool 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.77GPA
80.8% A
16.2% B
2.0% C
0.0% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Madison Keller 10 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.16
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.10
Michael Mayer 89 median item responses 3.35Eval / 5
Overall3.35 / 5

89 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.25
Course assignments facilitated learning3.39
Opportunities to be successful in course3.29
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.38
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.34
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.37
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.38
Alicia Howard 21 median item responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.73
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.78
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.68
Crista Thomas 18 median item responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.91
Course assignments facilitated learning4.95
Opportunities to be successful in course4.86
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.97
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.96
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.96
Yun Shen 22 median item responses 3.93Eval / 5
Overall3.93 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning3.88
Opportunities to be successful in course3.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.32
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.90
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.28
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.41
Miranda Crawford 19 median item responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.41
Course assignments facilitated learning4.28
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.41
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.28
Kenneth Galloway 18 median item responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.89
Course assignments facilitated learning4.86
Opportunities to be successful in course4.89
Matthew Sowa 22 median item responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.69
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.34
Roman Hodson 14 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.35
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Nicholas Mckibben 18 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.92
Course assignments facilitated learning4.89
Opportunities to be successful in course4.69
Kayla Anderson 13 median item responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.11
Patrick Larson 16 median item responses 3.41Eval / 5
Overall3.41 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.97
Course assignments facilitated learning3.95
Opportunities to be successful in course3.30
Benji Chavez 18 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.92
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Lucy Kim 10 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.47
Mingxiang Zhou 15 median item responses 3.55Eval / 5
Overall3.55 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.35
Course assignments facilitated learning3.91
Opportunities to be successful in course3.39
Akeem A. Sanni 10 median item responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.26
Opportunities to be successful in course3.81
Corey Mcdonald 6 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Yao Tang 8 median item responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.07
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course3.94
Ryan L. Perry 5 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.20
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.40
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.20
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.20
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.20
Garrett Mohr 22 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.65
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.79
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.70
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.72
Mina Aziz 10 median item responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.89
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.85
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.84
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.72
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.