Course record CHE

CHE 4232

Unit Operations Laboratory

Texas Tech University

2 sections10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2009–2025
Flunk Score27/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 10

Patrick Mclaurin 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.25GPA
25.0% A
75.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Chijuan Hu 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.72GPA
23.8% A
38.6% B
30.7% C
1.0% D
5.9% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Haoyu Zhao 10 median item responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.48
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course3.76
Ronald Hedden 11 median item responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.30
Course assignments facilitated learning4.10
Opportunities to be successful in course3.97
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.23
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.38
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.20
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.32
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.01
Mark Vaughn 6 median item responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course3.83
Jay Lu 8 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.47
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.47
John Zapata Hincapie 9 median item responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.85
Course assignments facilitated learning4.09
Opportunities to be successful in course3.88
Walid Hikal 4 median item responses 2.75Eval / 5
Overall2.75 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.10
Course assignments facilitated learning2.19
Opportunities to be successful in course2.13
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.95
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.90
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.92
Hui Tian 3 median item responses 2.05Eval / 5
Overall2.05 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.07
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.11
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.06
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
Theodore Wiesner 9 median item responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.91
Course assignments facilitated learning3.99
Opportunities to be successful in course3.93
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.22
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.52
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.04
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.28
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.72
Course documents

Syllabi 3

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.