Course record CHE

CHE 3323

Chemical Reaction Engineering

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable16 professors
Evaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 16 of 16

Haoyu Zhao 5 median item responses 3.79Eval / 5
Overall3.79 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course3.83
Mir Karim 3 median item responses 3.54Eval / 5
Overall3.54 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning3.33
Opportunities to be successful in course3.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.67
Ramesh Krishnan 12 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.03
Course assignments facilitated learning4.40
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.28
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.03
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.27
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.27
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.43
Nadia Sultana 7 median item responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.86
Yungpyo Koh 12 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.88
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Uzi Mann 32 median item responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.19
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course4.07
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.99
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.17
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.45
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.24
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.03
Micah Green 70 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

70 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.51
Course assignments facilitated learning4.43
Opportunities to be successful in course4.49
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.57
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.40
Ronald Hedden 50 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

50 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning4.28
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.32
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.48
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.32
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.30
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.16
Carla Lacerda 34 median item responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

34 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.51
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.31
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.24
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.43
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.22
Ya-Wen Chang 32 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Josh Howe 18 median item responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.11
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.37
Sheima Khatib 19 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Joshua D. Howe 32 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.46
Course assignments facilitated learning4.06
Opportunities to be successful in course3.88
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.27
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.34
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.91
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.91
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.88
Casey O'Brien 24 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.46
Wenshuo Hu 2 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Hui Tian 5 median item responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.21
Course assignments facilitated learning4.30
Opportunities to be successful in course4.20
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.04
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.96
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.35
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 1

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.