Course record CHE

CHE 3322

Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics II

Texas Tech University

2 sections16 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2025
Flunk Score2/100
Needs work

Professors 16 of 16

Rajesh Khare 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.66GPA
21.6% A
34.0% B
35.1% C
8.2% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Ronald Hedden 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 1.88GPA
7.1% A
21.4% B
37.8% C
18.4% D
15.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Raymond Edward Desrosiers 23 median item responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.09
Course assignments facilitated learning4.30
Opportunities to be successful in course4.27
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.36
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.70
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.39
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.91
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Lenore Lijun Dai 21 median item responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.85
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.85
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.72
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
Sunil Subhash Bhagwat 20 median item responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.20
Course assignments facilitated learning3.30
Opportunities to be successful in course3.35
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.20
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.05
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.95
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.45
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.50
Josh Howe 23 median item responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.43
John Zapata Hincapie 17 median item responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.41
Course assignments facilitated learning4.59
Opportunities to be successful in course4.24
Hui Tian 21 median item responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.94
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.13
Joshua D. Howe 20 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.72
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.28
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.13
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.13
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Casey O'Brien 16 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.72
Course assignments facilitated learning4.43
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.58
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.57
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.52
Xiao Zhao 7 median item responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.86
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Chau-Chyun Chen 6 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Uriel De Jesus Garza Rubalcava 4 median item responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Ramesh Krishnan 2 median item responses 3.50Eval / 5
Overall3.50 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course3.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Sindee Simon 27 median item responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

27 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.09
Course assignments facilitated learning4.39
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.34
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.39
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
Wenshuo Hu 8 median item responses 2.28Eval / 5
Overall2.28 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.59
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 2

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.