Course record CHE
CHE 2321
Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics I
Grade distribution unavailable7 professors
Evaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataThis course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Sindee Simon 25 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
25 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.56
Course assignments facilitated learning4.48
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.20
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.44
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.32
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.12
Hubert R. Heichelheim 15 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
15 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course4.27
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.53
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.20
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.87
Ramesh Krishnan 17 median item responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5
17 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.15
Course assignments facilitated learning3.58
Opportunities to be successful in course3.71
Mark Vaughn 5 median item responses 3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5
5 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.31
Course assignments facilitated learning3.65
Opportunities to be successful in course3.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.80
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.60
Inseok Chae 30 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
30 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.69
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.59
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.41
Purushottam Soni 11 median item responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
11 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.73
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.27
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.70
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.73
Walid Hikal 4 median item responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
4 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.47
Course assignments facilitated learning4.01
Opportunities to be successful in course3.98
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.38
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.27
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.23
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.10
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.