Course record CHE

CHE 2310

Introduction to Chemical Process

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 9 of 9

Uzi Mann 12 median item responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Mark Vaughn 20 median item responses 3.03Eval / 5
Overall3.03 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.67
Course assignments facilitated learning3.23
Opportunities to be successful in course3.19
Ramesh Krishnan 17 median item responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.53
Course assignments facilitated learning3.71
Opportunities to be successful in course3.82
Minxiang Zeng 11 median item responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.03
Course assignments facilitated learning4.52
Opportunities to be successful in course4.16
Jeremy Marston 19 median item responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.86
Hui Tian 10 median item responses 3.65Eval / 5
Overall3.65 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.09
Opportunities to be successful in course3.99
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.52
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.36
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.40
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.36
Joshua D. Howe 11 median item responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.28
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.08
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.46
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.84
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.04
Carla Lacerda 8 median item responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning4.13
Opportunities to be successful in course3.88
Walid Hikal 6 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning3.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.17
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.17
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Course documents

Syllabi 2

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.