Course record CE

CE 3321

Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering

Texas Tech University

5 sections11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score33/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 11

Rozbeh Moghaddam 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.29GPA
50.0% A
29.0% B
21.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Ho Young Seo 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.17GPA
35.0% A
49.0% B
15.0% C
1.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Suranga Gunerathne 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.08GPA
29.0% A
53.0% B
16.0% C
2.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Byungmin Kim 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.04GPA
27.0% A
51.0% B
22.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Priyantha Jayawickrama 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.81GPA
15.2% A
57.6% B
21.2% C
6.1% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

William Lawson 35 median item responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

35 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.28
Course assignments facilitated learning4.31
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.47
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.49
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.49
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Ameri Gurley 19 median item responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.95
Course assignments facilitated learning4.16
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Pawel A. Polaczyk 35 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

35 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.81
Course assignments facilitated learning4.76
Opportunities to be successful in course4.77
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.78
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.62
Yimin Lu 15 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.39
Opportunities to be successful in course4.44
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.26
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.18
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.09
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.10
Raghu Betha 24 median item responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course3.89
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.12
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.18
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.94
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.04
Show all 11 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 7

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
4 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.