Course record CE

CE 3303

Mechanics of Solids

Texas Tech University

4 sections18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score4/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 18

David Spears 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.51GPA
16.3% A
37.0% B
32.6% C
9.8% D
4.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Ameri Gurley 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.50GPA
19.6% A
34.8% B
27.2% C
13.0% D
5.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Russell Carter 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.34GPA
20.5% A
22.7% B
36.4% C
11.4% D
9.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Xinzhong Chen 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.17GPA
8.1% A
25.6% B
50.0% C
8.1% D
8.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kishor C. Mehta 27 median item responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5

27 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.75
Course assignments facilitated learning3.88
Opportunities to be successful in course3.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.04
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.39
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.05
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.83
Sanjaya Senadheera 29 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

29 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.41
Opportunities to be successful in course4.28
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.51
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.59
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.42
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.32
Ernst W. Kiesling 33 median item responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

33 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.07
Course assignments facilitated learning3.98
Opportunities to be successful in course3.76
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.18
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.26
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.83
Larry Tanner 43 median item responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5

43 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning3.93
Opportunities to be successful in course3.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.26
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.18
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.14
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.37
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.72
H Norville 19 median item responses 3.62Eval / 5
Overall3.62 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.55
Course assignments facilitated learning3.82
Opportunities to be successful in course3.48
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.56
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.98
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.40
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.54
Delong Zuo 18 median item responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.72
Course assignments facilitated learning4.16
Opportunities to be successful in course3.78
Show all 18 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 7

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

4 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.