Course record CE

CE 2301

Statics

Texas Tech University

5 sections20 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score6/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 20

Ameri Gurley 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.69GPA
15.9% A
44.3% B
35.2% C
2.3% D
2.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Russell Carter 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.52GPA
24.1% A
27.7% B
27.7% C
16.9% D
3.6% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

H Norville 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.49GPA
27.7% A
24.5% B
25.5% C
13.8% D
8.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

David Spears 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.41GPA
22.3% A
26.6% B
28.7% C
14.9% D
7.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jieying Hua 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.37GPA
20.0% A
24.2% B
34.7% C
16.8% D
4.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

John Borrelli 23 median item responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.43
Course assignments facilitated learning4.48
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.48
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.39
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.48
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.35
Ernst W. Kiesling 47 median item responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

47 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.98
Course assignments facilitated learning3.84
Opportunities to be successful in course3.68
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.26
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.15
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.03
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.29
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.66
Hector M Garcia 43 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

43 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.40
Course assignments facilitated learning4.72
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.65
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.53
Sanjaya Senadheera 47 median item responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

47 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.42
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.23
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.32
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.29
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.13
Ronald Pigott 24 median item responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.13
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.58
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.21
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.13
Show all 20 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 13

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

10 more syllabi

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.