Course record BIOL

BIOL 3309

Principles of Ecology

Texas Tech University

5 sections23 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score3/100
Needs work

Professors 23 of 23

Ron Chesser 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.60GPA
19.0% A
42.0% B
25.0% C
10.0% D
4.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Stephanie Lockwood 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.50GPA
21.8% A
32.2% B
20.7% C
25.3% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Liam Mcguire 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.25GPA
15.6% A
31.3% B
25.0% C
17.7% D
10.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Dylan Schwilk 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.20GPA
17.0% A
26.1% B
27.3% C
18.2% D
11.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kenneth Schmidt 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.11GPA
17.2% A
17.2% B
38.7% C
12.9% D
14.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Richard Joseph Deslippe 10 median item responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.26
Course assignments facilitated learning4.22
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.20
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.48
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.02
Brian Sanderson 62 median item responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5

62 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.73
Course assignments facilitated learning4.23
Opportunities to be successful in course3.87
Joseph D. Manthey 106 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

106 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.54
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.51
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.59
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.53
Natasja C. Van Gestel 84 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

84 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.62
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.57
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.61
Andres L. Rodriguez Cordero 15 median item responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.87
Course assignments facilitated learning4.87
Opportunities to be successful in course4.84
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.83
Rita Margarida Quinones Magalhaes 14 median item responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.64
Course assignments facilitated learning4.79
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Scott Starr 36 median item responses 4.15Eval / 5
Overall4.15 / 5

36 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.94
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course3.94
Ryan Vazquez 20 median item responses 4.08Eval / 5
Overall4.08 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.03
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.90
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.90
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.15
Nancy Mcintyre 53 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

53 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.30
Course assignments facilitated learning4.52
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.51
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.64
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.62
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.47
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.55
Matthew J Gray 73 median item responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

73 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.97
Course assignments facilitated learning3.99
Opportunities to be successful in course3.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.04
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.15
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.05
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.04
Thomas W Schwertner 2 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.00
Course assignments facilitated learning4.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Thomas Lee Arsuffi 34 median item responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

34 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.41
Course assignments facilitated learning4.35
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.64
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.52
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
Pooya Aavani 57 median item responses 3.50Eval / 5
Overall3.50 / 5

57 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.40
Course assignments facilitated learning3.63
Opportunities to be successful in course3.47
Joseph R. Mcmillan 39 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

39 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.66
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.51
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.55
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.47
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.43
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.49
Craig R Zimmermann 56 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

56 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning4.30
Opportunities to be successful in course4.20
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.53
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.40
Tigga Kingston 46 median item responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5

46 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.47
Course assignments facilitated learning3.69
Opportunities to be successful in course3.39
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.08
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.37
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.77
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.21
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.62
Traesha Robertson 9 median item responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Donna E Hamilton 4 median item responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.82
Course assignments facilitated learning3.71
Opportunities to be successful in course3.68
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.22
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.52
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.72
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.39
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.84
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 6

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Van Gestel, Natasja

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
3 more syllabi

Summer II 2025 · Section not specified

Rodriguez Cordero, Andres

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.