Course record BIOL

BIOL 1404

Biology II

Texas Tech University

1 section80 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 10 of 80

Michael Dini 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.30GPA
14.6% A
30.3% B
31.5% C
18.0% D
5.6% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Anisha S. Navlekar 55 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

55 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.53
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.53
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.66
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.64
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.55
Daniel Owusu Kwakye 14 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.23
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.38
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.39
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Jeffrey S. Bernard 10 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.69
Course assignments facilitated learning4.69
Opportunities to be successful in course4.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.82
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.75
Anusha Reddy Govindu 16 median item responses 3.51Eval / 5
Overall3.51 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.50
Course assignments facilitated learning3.50
Opportunities to be successful in course3.94
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.81
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.31
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.25
Mark Alan Mcginley 55 median item responses 4.20Eval / 5
Overall4.20 / 5

55 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.10
Course assignments facilitated learning4.29
Opportunities to be successful in course4.34
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.07
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.37
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.97
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.22
Kari S Malen 23 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.09
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.82
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.68
Carrie Monje 8 median item responses 3.39Eval / 5
Overall3.39 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.74
Course assignments facilitated learning3.68
Opportunities to be successful in course3.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.47
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.55
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.54
Diana Vargas Gutierrez 14 median item responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.28
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Jeff Clerc 16 median item responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.69
Show all 80 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 8

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Chouvalova, Anastasia

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
5 more syllabi

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Navlekar, Anisha

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.