Course record ASTR

ASTR 1100

Astronomy Laboratory Science

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable11 professors
Evaluations: 2001–2018

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 10 of 11

Venatesh Sharma 19 median item responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.66
Course assignments facilitated learning3.76
Opportunities to be successful in course3.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.15
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.97
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.89
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.30
Sameer Girish Thakar 16 median item responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.60
Course assignments facilitated learning3.32
Opportunities to be successful in course3.34
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.89
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.58
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.92
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.08
Patrice Marie Marshall 22 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.41
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.52
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.65
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
Sujoy Ganguly 16 median item responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.64
Opportunities to be successful in course4.65
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.84
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.87
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.54
Keith West 1 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

1 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.83
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Brian L Cannon 23 median item responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.52
Course assignments facilitated learning4.57
Opportunities to be successful in course4.52
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.65
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.74
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.70
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.70
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.57
Jose F Flores 18 median item responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.50
Course assignments facilitated learning3.48
Opportunities to be successful in course3.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.69
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.96
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.17
Ronald J Wilhelm 20 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.60
Course assignments facilitated learning4.40
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.65
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.05
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.65
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.10
Jason Phillip Mosley 20 median item responses 3.59Eval / 5
Overall3.59 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.39
Course assignments facilitated learning3.55
Opportunities to be successful in course3.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.90
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.78
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.04
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.13
Eric S Bates 16 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning4.41
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.65
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.58
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.60
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.