Course record ARTH

ARTH 2302

Art History Survey II

Texas Tech University

3 sections12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2011–2026
Flunk Score32/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 12

Katharine Scherff 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.19GPA
52.1% A
22.3% B
18.1% C
5.3% D
2.1% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jason Scott Derouin 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.09GPA
41.0% A
32.0% B
23.0% C
4.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Kevin Chua 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.90GPA
25.0% A
60.0% B
5.0% C
0.0% D
10.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Bryan Wheeler 21 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.35
Opportunities to be successful in course4.29
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.56
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.45
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.30
Esen Ogus Uzun 28 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.22
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course4.07
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.34
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.30
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.21
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
Constance Cortez 21 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.80
Course assignments facilitated learning4.84
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Elena Popan 14 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.31
Lesley Wolff 15 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.79
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Diana L. Mccutcheon 9 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.28
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Klinton Burgio-Ericson 15 median item responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.30
Opportunities to be successful in course4.49
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.20
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.23
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.11
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.02
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.22
Show all 12 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 4

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

1 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.