Course record ART

ART 3386

Computer Design Methods II

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable16 professors
Evaluations: 2008–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 10 of 16

Sean Shaver 18 median item responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.04
Course assignments facilitated learning3.94
Opportunities to be successful in course3.92
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.04
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.35
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.08
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.21
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.76
Brett Stallings 17 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.32
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.48
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.72
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.76
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.82
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.48
Jonathan King 15 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.73
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.61
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.72
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.66
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.51
Stephen Esquivel 14 median item responses 3.42Eval / 5
Overall3.42 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.29
Course assignments facilitated learning2.93
Opportunities to be successful in course2.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.08
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.43
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.21
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.57
Jonathan Looney 9 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.55
Course assignments facilitated learning4.76
Opportunities to be successful in course4.64
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.89
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.89
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Joshua Mathis 9 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.89
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Amber Moralez 11 median item responses 4.09Eval / 5
Overall4.09 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.09
Course assignments facilitated learning4.09
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Christopher Perez 17 median item responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

17 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.03
Course assignments facilitated learning3.96
Opportunities to be successful in course4.17
Blake Ferguson 16 median item responses 4.88Eval / 5
Overall4.88 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.81
Course assignments facilitated learning4.94
Opportunities to be successful in course4.88
Amber Stone 6 median item responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.71
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Show all 16 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 1

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.