Course record ART

ART 3372

Rethinking Art Education

Texas Tech University

5 sections46 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2025
Flunk Score78/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 46

Sara White 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.94GPA
94.0% A
6.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

David Bondt 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.89GPA
90.0% A
10.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Gary Johnson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.76GPA
83.0% A
13.0% B
2.0% C
0.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Cynthia Peanick 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.47GPA
69.8% A
17.7% B
7.3% C
1.0% D
4.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Corina Carmona 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.40GPA
60.0% A
20.0% B
20.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

John A. Stinespring 14 median item responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.23
Course assignments facilitated learning4.27
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.97
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.38
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.31
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.09
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.23
Dennis Earl Fehr 14 median item responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.43
Course assignments facilitated learning4.48
Opportunities to be successful in course4.51
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.57
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.41
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.42
Joyce M Centofanti 16 median item responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.69
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.69
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.69
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.69
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.69
Edward Check 13 median item responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.75
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.72
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.82
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.72
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.82
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.56
Deborah Milosevich 13 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.16
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.55
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.55
Show all 46 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.