Course record ART

ART 2303

3D Design

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable38 professors
Evaluations: 2007–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 10 of 38

Sarah Krupp 14 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.43
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.34
Von Alan Venhuizen 11 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.64
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.66
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.28
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.72
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.46
John J Wells 15 median item responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.74
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.93
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.93
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.88
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.90
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.82
Rolando Shaw 11 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.14
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course4.29
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.15
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Jonathan C Gamblin 13 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.32
Course assignments facilitated learning4.51
Opportunities to be successful in course4.72
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.79
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.57
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.59
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.54
Robly A Glover 12 median item responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.83
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.83
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.83
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.50
William Cannings 11 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.98
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course4.21
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.29
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.32
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.30
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.30
Emily S Schuhmann 15 median item responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.68
Opportunities to be successful in course4.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.65
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.82
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.76
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.62
Do Kyun Lee 14 median item responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.98
Course assignments facilitated learning4.09
Opportunities to be successful in course4.16
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.32
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.46
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.96
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.37
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.90
Sean Scully 12 median item responses 3.23Eval / 5
Overall3.23 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.23
Course assignments facilitated learning3.12
Opportunities to be successful in course2.94
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.60
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.07
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.69
Show all 38 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 4

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Zalakos, Jonathon

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
1 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.