Course record ART

ART 1303

Drawing I

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable60 professors
Evaluations: 2007–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 10 of 60

Kathryn Kelley 14 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.48
Course assignments facilitated learning4.52
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
David C Lindsay 15 median item responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.42
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.68
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.55
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.38
Lestat Alexander 12 median item responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.28
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.32
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.68
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.34
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.28
Jeffrey Wheeler 14 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning4.58
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.55
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.69
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.51
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.61
Shannon Cannings 15 median item responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.70
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.68
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.78
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.74
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.76
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.68
Sang-Mi Yoo 14 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.22
Course assignments facilitated learning4.41
Opportunities to be successful in course4.23
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.44
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.37
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.96
Leslie Laine Lewis 11 median item responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.82
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.91
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.91
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.91
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.82
Michael C Stone 8 median item responses 4.46Eval / 5
Overall4.46 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.63
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.25
Stacy Renee Elko 13 median item responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.02
Opportunities to be successful in course3.96
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.97
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.08
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.05
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.75
Scotty Hensler 13 median item responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.12
Course assignments facilitated learning4.11
Opportunities to be successful in course4.12
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.17
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.31
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.02
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.38
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.88
Show all 60 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 9

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Resendez, Samantha

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
6 more syllabi

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Resendez, Samantha

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.