Course record ARCH

ARCH 3355

Architectural Technology IV: Atmosphere

Texas Tech University

2 sections20 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2004–2026
Flunk Score20/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 20

Guillermo Barajas 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.89GPA
11.0% A
67.0% B
22.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Peter Raab 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.81GPA
8.9% A
64.4% B
24.8% C
2.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

David Vernooy 76 median item responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

76 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.21
Course assignments facilitated learning3.75
Opportunities to be successful in course3.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.20
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.85
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.27
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.55
Arc Andrew Vernooy 79 median item responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5

79 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.98
Course assignments facilitated learning3.59
Opportunities to be successful in course3.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.26
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.23
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.36
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.15
Raimund Mcclain 79 median item responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

79 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.90
Course assignments facilitated learning4.08
Opportunities to be successful in course3.99
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.10
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.38
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.87
Kentaro Tsubaki 89 median item responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

89 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning3.98
Opportunities to be successful in course3.90
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.92
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.60
Luis Rios 21 median item responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.46
Course assignments facilitated learning3.65
Opportunities to be successful in course3.49
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.24
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.65
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.92
Catherine S. Soderberg 7 median item responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.48
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.71
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Kimberley J. Mcglone 8 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.56
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.88
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.82
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.88
Raymond Dewyatt Powell 76 median item responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5

76 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.19
Course assignments facilitated learning3.47
Opportunities to be successful in course3.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.05
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.65
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.09
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.09
Show all 20 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Khairnar, Piyush

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
2 more syllabi

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Khairnar, Piyush

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.