Course record ARCH

ARCH 3355

Architectural Technology IV: Atmosphere

Texas Tech University

2 sections20 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2004–2026
Flunk Score20/100
Below average

Professors 20 of 20

Guillermo Barajas 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.89GPA
11.0% A
67.0% B
22.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Peter Raab 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.81GPA
8.9% A
64.4% B
24.8% C
2.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

David Vernooy 76 median item responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

76 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.21
Course assignments facilitated learning3.75
Opportunities to be successful in course3.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.20
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.85
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.27
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.55
Arc Andrew Vernooy 79 median item responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5

79 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.98
Course assignments facilitated learning3.59
Opportunities to be successful in course3.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.26
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.23
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.36
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.15
Raimund Mcclain 79 median item responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

79 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.90
Course assignments facilitated learning4.08
Opportunities to be successful in course3.99
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.10
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.38
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.87
Kentaro Tsubaki 89 median item responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5

89 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning3.98
Opportunities to be successful in course3.90
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.92
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.60
Luis Rios 21 median item responses 3.48Eval / 5
Overall3.48 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.46
Course assignments facilitated learning3.65
Opportunities to be successful in course3.49
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.70
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.24
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.65
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.92
Catherine S. Soderberg 7 median item responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.48
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.71
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.71
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Kimberley J. Mcglone 8 median item responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.56
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.61
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.88
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.88
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.82
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.88
Raymond Dewyatt Powell 76 median item responses 3.77Eval / 5
Overall3.77 / 5

76 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.19
Course assignments facilitated learning3.47
Opportunities to be successful in course3.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.05
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.65
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.09
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.09
Geoffrey Wright 20 median item responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.15
Course assignments facilitated learning3.93
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.41
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.87
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.48
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.77
Stephen Mueller 13 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.38
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Rafael Duran 22 median item responses 3.51Eval / 5
Overall3.51 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.59
Course assignments facilitated learning3.45
Opportunities to be successful in course3.50
Frederic Dalbin 16 median item responses 2.29Eval / 5
Overall2.29 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.06
Course assignments facilitated learning2.56
Opportunities to be successful in course2.25
Armando Rigau Yumet 2 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Jeremy Christopher Wahlberg 10 median item responses 3.27Eval / 5
Overall3.27 / 5

10 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.40
Course assignments facilitated learning3.50
Opportunities to be successful in course2.90
Hazem Rashed-Ali 24 median item responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning4.13
Opportunities to be successful in course4.04
Peng Du 23 median item responses 4.38Eval / 5
Overall4.38 / 5

23 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.35
Course assignments facilitated learning4.61
Opportunities to be successful in course4.52
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.26
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.26
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.35
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.43
Geoffery Charles Wright 15 median item responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.27
Course assignments facilitated learning4.07
Opportunities to be successful in course4.33
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.53
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.53
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.57
Piyush R. Khairnar 35 median item responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

35 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.02
Course assignments facilitated learning4.14
Opportunities to be successful in course3.99
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.98
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.92
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.10
Show fewer
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Khairnar, Piyush

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
2 more syllabi

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Khairnar, Piyush

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.