Course record ARCH

ARCH 2353

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable17 professors
Evaluations: 2001–2008

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 10 of 17

Christopher M Osborne 13 median item responses 3.70Eval / 5
Overall3.70 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning3.72
Opportunities to be successful in course3.52
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.77
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.85
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.98
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.17
Jeremy C Rumph 12 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.35
Opportunities to be successful in course4.35
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.35
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.37
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.45
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.41
William R Duncan 13 median item responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.46
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.15
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.46
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.92
Ryan John Mcguire 13 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.37
Course assignments facilitated learning4.37
Opportunities to be successful in course4.32
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.54
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.50
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.51
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.21
Giovann J Aguilar 9 median item responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.44
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.56
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.56
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.56
Stanley Andrew Robertson 13 median item responses 4.17Eval / 5
Overall4.17 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning4.14
Opportunities to be successful in course4.01
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.33
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.43
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.40
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.78
Derek Blankenship 16 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.50
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course4.13
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.63
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.39
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.01
Stan Andrew Robertson 16 median item responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.05
Course assignments facilitated learning3.87
Opportunities to be successful in course3.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.05
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.84
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.16
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.38
Josh Nason 16 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.31
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.81
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.75
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.31
Jeffrey Scott Nesbit 14 median item responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.48
Course assignments facilitated learning4.68
Opportunities to be successful in course4.72
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.83
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.66
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.21
Show all 17 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.